|
|
| Author |
Message |
poacherinthezoo Newbie Alert
Joined: 03 Dec 2003
    Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2003 6:41 pm Post subject: Epiphone Les Paul Studio |
|
|
| I'm thinking about getting the Les Paul studio, can anyone shed some light on this guitar as far as if it is good or bad and why? Thank you |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
weelie Fierce Poodle
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
     Posts: 288 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
This I quote from a certain mister Nocaster off his own forum:
"Les Paul Standard vs Les Paul Studio:
Gibson Les Paul ws: http://www.gibson.com/products/gibson/lespaul/index.html
Binding is a time consuming process and it is the main constructional difference.
Tone-wise, the bodies and necks of all the carved maple topped versions are essentially the same.
While specs keep changing, the *current* differences are:
Studios:
top: carved maple (carved figured AA on Plus)
back: mahogany
pups: 490R/498T (Gibson’s modern classic, rock combo)
neck shape: 59 rounded
Standards:
top: carved AA maple
back: mahogany
pups: Burstbuckers (Gibson’s latest)
neck shape: 50's rounded or 60's slim taper
Classics:
top: carved maple
back: mahogany
pups: 496R/500T (Gibson’s hot ceramic combo)
neck shape: 1960 slim taper
NB. better grade maple and figured wood does not necessarily provide better tone.
Gibson pickups ws: www.gibsonstrings.com/pickups.html
" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACfixer German Shepherd
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
     Posts: 348 Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| weelie wrote: | | NB. better grade maple and figured wood does not necessarily provide better tone. |
THAT is a fact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
owwdatune Moderator
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
     Posts: 1062 Location: ..just a 'lil bit over the edge..USA !!!
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ACfixer wrote: | | weelie wrote: | | NB. better grade maple and figured wood does not necessarily provide better tone. |
THAT is a fact. |
THAT is DEFINATELY a FACT !!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poacherinthezoo Newbie Alert
Joined: 03 Dec 2003
    Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm terribly sorry, I forgot to say that it was the Epiphone Les Paul studio, does that change what you said? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doogz Big Goldfish
Joined: 14 Dec 2003
    Posts: 73
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Umm, i have an epiphone les paul studio and am rly pleased with it. It does everything u need, sounds gd and is a good price.
I recommend it.
Doogz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ccwilde Fierce Puppy
Joined: 12 Nov 2003
    Posts: 242
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i have a gibson les paul studio its sweet good sound. I figure the epiphone is just cheaper and less quality. I like it cuz it has no locking neck so its easy to switch tuning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shindig201 Tadpole
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
    Posts: 18
|
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Its a good guitar. I think u should go for it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|